ABSTRACT
This research work is aimed at finding the journalist that is freer between those in private and government owned media organizations, using Ray-power and FRCN Enugu as a focus, to achieve maximum and accurate findings. The researcher made use of survey design. To gather necessary information, copies of questionnaire were administered and retrieved from the respondents who were randomly selected and also personal interview was conducted, the findings show that the journalists in government owned media organizations are freer than those in privately owned media organizations. The researcher also made some recommendations based on the findings of the research. That more opportunities should be given to the journalists in private owned media i.e. they should be allowed to broadcast what they see or the information they get as long as it is proven to be true. Since it has been identified that source credibility is essential in broadcasting, as it affects the audience believe, so both government and private owned journalists should be given equal rights to broadcast what they see and how it was seen without limit and threats.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page - - - - - - - - - - - -i
Approval Page - - - - - - - - - - -ii
Dedication - - - - - - - - - - -iii
Acknowledgement - - - - - - - - -iv
Abstract - - - - - - - - - - -v
Table of Contents - - - - - - - - -vi
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction - - - - - - - - -1
1.1 Background Of The Study - - - - - -1
1.2 The Concept Of Press Freedom - - - - - -3
1.3 Statement Of The Problem - -- - - - - -5
1.4 Objective Of The Study - - - - - -6
1.5 Research Questions - - - - - - -6
1.6 Significance Of The Study - - - - - -7
vii
1.7 Scope And Limitation Of The Study - - - -8
1.8 Definition Of Terms - - - - - - - -8
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Literature Review - - - - - - -10
2.1 sources of Literature - - - - - - - -12
2.2 Review of Relayed Literature - - - - - - -12
2.2.1 Codes Of Ethics For Journalist - - - - - -13
2.3 Theoretical Framework - - - -- - - -31
2.4 Summary of the Literature Review - - - - - -32
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 Research Methodology - - - - - - -34
3.2 Area Of Study - - - - - - - -34
3.3 Population Of The Study -- - - - - - -34
3.4 Research Sample Size And Sampling Technique - - -35
viii
3.5 Instrument For Data Collection - - - - - -35
3.6 Validity Of The Instrument - - - - - - - 39
3.7 Method Of Data Collection - - - - - - -36
3.8 Method Of Data Analysis - - - - - -37
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1Data Presentation And Analysis - - - - - -38
4.2 Discussion And Findings - - - - - - -53
CHAPTER FIVE
Summary, Conclusion And Recommendations
5.1 Summary - - - - - - - - - -55
5.2 Conclusion - - - - - - - - -56
5.3 Recommendations - - - - - - - -57
Reference - - - - - - - - -59
Appendix - - - - - - - - -61
1
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The term mass media according to McQuail [2000] is shortened to describe a means of communication that operates on a large scale reaching and involving virtually everyone in a society to a greater or lesser degree. Media is plural of medium which means a channel or vehicle through which something is transmitted. In other words, mass media are channels of communication in a modern society, primarily the print and the electronic media. MCQuail further describes the mass media as the organized many receivers within a short space of time. The mass media are impersonal communication sources that reach large audiences. The primary function of the mass media system is to provide information to several millions of people. The mass media are extremely influential. Each of the media is presumed tom affect perceptions and behaviour in a distinctive way. They can affect the society and vice versa. The mass media are the uniquely modern means of public communication and much of their importance lies in the fact that they are a major cause of whatever modes of perception,
2
thought, public discourse and political action. Because of their size and the larger number of people they reach the mass media tremendous impact on society. Murphy (1977) sums up societal impacts of the media in different way as oil, give and dynamite. As oil, Murphy asserts that media of communication keep the world running smoothly by helping individuals adjust to the reality of lives. They keep society on and healthy by suggesting solutions that are socially acceptable.
As given, social cohesion is maintained by communication. Murphy contends that the media give all of us including strangers, something to talk about by setting agenda of discussion. And that over the years, communication builds up and reinforces the fabrics that hold a society together. Murphy also describes the mass media as dynamites that can rip the society apart. A good example of this is the propaganda campaigns that preceded the Russian revolution in 1917 and Hitler‟s rise to the German chancellorship in 1933. Similarly, the mass media particularly the newspaper and magazine played a tremendous role in the struggle for Nigeria‟s independence in 1960.
3
1.2 THE CONCEPT OF PRESS FREEDOM
There is a general notion that press freedom is bard to define. While others look at it as the night to communicate ideas, opinions and information through the printed word without government restraint, the difficulty actually lies in defining the word “Press” itself. Is the word “press” made up of newspaper, magazine, journals or does it include broadcasting and other forms of communication yet dreamt of? Another dilemma in demystifying the concept of press freedom is in the degree of freedom sought or implied in the concept.
Press freedom is practically the same thing with freedom of expression which many people believe is the mother of all freedom. Press freedom connotes a free flow of information and the rights to disseminate information. According to Thomas Matting, Resident Representative Nigeria, the relevance of the media in democracy is undisputed. Media freedom is a fundamental political freedom based on the right to free speech. The media set the stage for public discussion and undertakes to be a watchdog of government action. But media freedom is fragile, good and journalists are particularly exposed to threats. They operate at the frontlines of a battle for political power that is often waged with deadly
4
weapons. Censorship, harassment and imprisonment of journalists and political control of news outlets are some of the most often cited dangers to a free media. Reports about killings of journalists frequently shock the public less often cited is the overall working and welfare situation of journalists. However, the freedom from fear and want is one of the four fundamental human freedoms that the us president Franklin D. Roosevelt emphasized in 1941. Without it being granted, a country can have perfect media laws; it can establish codes of conducts for journalists and boost media plurality (all this fundamentally endangered it Journalists operate under conditions of fear and deprivation).
Though, there is no absolute press freedom anywhere in the world. However, Nigeria which professes to have one of the most free presses in Africa has a lot of limitations to press freedom. Sunday (2006 : 115) argued that press freedom is limited in the overall interest of the society by the constitution, the legislature, the courts and the government. It is contradictory to discover that the some constitution which guarantees press freedom takes away the same freedom it gives to media men. The 1999 constitution for instance, has given conditions for expression of freedom. According to this statute book, expression of
5
freedom is subject to any law that is reasonably Justifiable in a democratic society.
SHARE THIS PAGE!